Experts say the industry is watching the case closely though one expert said a ruling against Trump likely won't get the industry much money back.
"The president is using these taxes to buy justice; he is using the tariffs to end the war in Russia and Ukraine, where he has told India 'stop buying oil,'' Lutnick said.
Should the court manage to overturn the tariffs without refunding the revenue, Trump should take a public loss as a private win and return to focusing on economic growth.
Brian Kelsey, a senior attorney at the America First Policy Institute who helped write a brief to the Supreme Court defending ...
The three Trump-appointed Supreme Court justices shared apparent interest in legal rationales that could deliver the ...
President Donald Trump told reporters Thursday it would be “devastating for our country” if he lost a Supreme Court case that could invalidate his administration’s most far-reaching tariffs.
The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments on the limits, if any, under which the President can impose tariffs under the ...
In Washington today, the word “emergency” is a magic key; it unlocks powers Congress never granted, suspends the discipline of regular order and decorates bloated bills with provisions ...
Is the Supreme Court really a conservative court, bound by conservative principles of statutory construction and judicial review, or is it President Donald Trump's Court, ready to do his bidding, no ...
In times of national emergency, should the Supreme Court dictate America’s grand strategy and international economic policies? This question confronts the justices in Learning Resources v. Trump, a ...
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick claimed President Trump used tariffs as a diplomatic tool to "buy justice" and urged India ...
The takeaway is that the tariffs may actually fall because of the conservative justices’ sincere commitment to their own ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback